Comparative risk of high-risk neoplasia after polypectomy among individuals aged below 50 years versus 50 years and older
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Limited evidence supports colonoscopy surveillance practices among individuals aged <50 years. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of polyp recurrence and colorectal cancer (CRC) among young and old adults after polypectomy. DESIGN: We prospectively examined the risk of metachronous high-risk neoplasia, including high-risk adenoma, high-risk serrated polyp (SP) and CRC, according to index colonoscopy findings among individuals aged <50 years and ≥50 years who had received ≥1 follow-up colonoscopy in the Mass General Brigham Colonoscopy Cohort (2007-2023). We used a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model to calculate HRs. RESULTS: >0.05) once the analysis was restricted to index colonoscopy for screening purposes only. Among screened individuals, in both age groups, the association was particularly strong for individuals with index high-risk lesions and peaked at 3 years after polypectomy, with HRs (95% CI) of 4.60 (3.63 to 5.84) and 5.59 (3.89 to 8.03) for young adults with index high-risk adenoma and high-risk SPs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing polypectomy at a screening colonoscopy below age 50 years exhibited a similarly increased risk of metachronous neoplasia as those aged ≥50 years, suggesting that current surveillance guidelines developed in old adults may apply to young adults.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparative risk of high-risk neoplasia after polypectomy among individuals aged below 50 years versus 50 years and older
- Date Crossref
- 24/08/2025
- Éditeur
- BMJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.