Assessing the risks and benefits of investigational new drugs in adult phase-I oncology trials in China, 2013–2021
Résumé fourni par la source
Previous research shows that the benefits of phase-I oncology trials increased from 5 to 18% between 2000 and 2019 globally. However, the risk-benefit profile of phase-I trials in China is unclear. This study aims to analyze the risk-benefit profile of phase-I oncology trials in China and explore their correlation. We included adult phase-I oncology trials registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and Information Disclosure Platform between September 2013 and December 2021. Data on response rates and grade-3/4 adverse events were retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, and CNKI to assess their correlation. A total of 189 trials with 9591 patients were analyzed. The median response rate was 25.4% (IQR, 9.4-41.4%), and the overall incidence of grade-3/4 adverse events was 29.3% (IQR, 15.0-43.8%). No significant trends were observed over time. Subgroup analysis showed higher response rates in lymphoma (45.8%), cell therapies (80.0%), and biomarker trials (38.0%). Higher adverse event rates were seen in breast cancer (55.0%), chemical drugs (33.3%), cytotoxic drugs (73.3%), and combination therapies (35.7%). A weak correlation was found between response rates and grade-3/4 adverse events (ρ = 0.217; p = 0.003), with a moderate correlation in immunotherapy (ρ = 0.417; p < 0.001). This is the first assessment of early efficacy and safety signals of phase-I oncology trials in China. No significant temporal trends were identified. However, the correlation in immunotherapy suggests that higher benefits may be accompanied by greater risks.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Assessing the risks and benefits of investigational new drugs in adult phase-I oncology trials in China, 2013–2021
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.