Fingerprint-Based Machine Learning for SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV Mpro Inhibition: Highlighting the Potential of Bayesian Neural Networks
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) are two important targets in current drug discovery, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the MERS-CoV outbreaks in recent years. An important target of both SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV is the main protease ($M^{pro}$). The ASAP Discovery Consortium focused in the recent years on the acceleration of $M^{pro}$ inhibitors with a part of this initiative being an open blind challenge in collaboration with Valence lab using the Polaris platform, where datasets of previously undisclosed inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 $M^{pro}$ and MERS-CoV $M^{pro}$ was shared with researchers, to allow the development of machine learning and deep learning models for the prediction of the potency. We used this opportunity to evaluate and compare traditional machine learning models consisting of a random forest (RF) and gradient boosting model (XGBoost) with a bayesian neural network (BNN) model. For this purpose, we created single task models for the predictions for each of the targets. The results obtained showed that the BNN model outperformed both traditional machine learning models for both targets, indicating that BNNs are a promising deep learning framework in low-data regimes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Fingerprint-Based Machine Learning for SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV Mpro Inhibition: Highlighting the Potential of Bayesian Neural Networks
- Date Crossref
- 22/08/2025
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.