Titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA Against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Workers from a General Hospital in Mexico City
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to better understand the antibody concentrations in healthcare workers (HCWs) from a hospital in Mexico City with a high density of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Up to 243 HCWs were recruited in 2020 and 2022 and were sorted into three groups: hybrid immunity (HI, natural infection plus vaccination), vaccine-induced immunity (VI), and unvaccinated but RT-qPCR negative at the beginning of the pandemic (UV). Peripheral blood and nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained; additionally, saliva samples were obtained from the UV group. The titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (NCP) proteins were assessed using an in-house ELISA, and positivity to the virus was determined via RT-qPCR. RESULTS: Most HI and VI participants were positive for serum anti-RBD IgG (92.8% and 100%, respectively), while 26.6% (for HI) and 19% (for VI) were positive for anti-NCP IgG. Regarding serum anti-RBD IgA, the VI and HI groups had positive rates of 87.3% and 66%, respectively. In contrast, the UV group showed a rate of 5.7% but the positivity for IgA in saliva was higher (52% for RBD and 35% for NCP). In addition, the highest antibody titers were obtained for anti-RBD IgG and IgA in the HI and VI groups, respectively. In saliva, the IgA antibody titer was higher for the RBD antigen (1:1280). CONCLUSIONS: These results strengthen our understanding of antibody concentrations in HCWs during two critical years of the pandemic in a general hospital with many COVID-19 patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Titers of IgG, IgM, and IgA Against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Workers from a General Hospital in Mexico City
- Date Crossref
- 22/08/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.