Comparison of incidentally detected focal FDG uptake in the thyroid gland on PET/CT with fine needle aspiration biopsy results
Rattachement africain : ag. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Objectives: To compare the SUVmax–SUVmean values of the thyroid gland nodules and the SUVmax–SUVmean ratios of the nodules to normal thyroid gland with the fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) results, to determine the importance of nodule SUVmax value in the detection of malignancy. Methods: This study included 788 patients without a diagnosis of thyroid cancer who exhibited focal uptake in the thyroid gland on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Of these, 131 patients underwent FNAB. SUVmax–SUVmean values of the nodules and normal thyroid tissue were measured on PET/CT imaging, along with the pathology reports of the patients who underwent FNAB. Results: Patients with malignant tumors, nodules exhibited higher SUVmax and SUVmean values for both nodules and nodules/normal thyroid tissue ratio compared to those with benign group. The thyroid SUVmax and SUVmean values were higher in the benign group. The area under the curve for the nodule SUVmax was 84.6%, and the cut-off value was determined to be 5.5, with a discrimination ability of 80%–90%. Conclusion: The area under the curve for the nodule SUVmax showed the statistical significance of the diagnostic discrimination ability of the test. The findings suggest that nodule SUVmax provides good discrimination ability for malignancy detection, indicating its potential utility as a diagnostic marker.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of incidentally detected focal FDG uptake in the thyroid gland on PET/CT with fine needle aspiration biopsy results
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Armed Forces Medical Services
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.