Paradoxical Reactions of Central Nervous System Tuberculosis: Report of Three Immunocompetent Cases
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Paradoxical reactions during tuberculosis (TBC) therapy are characterized by clinical or radiological worsening of preexisting tuberculous lesions or the appearance of new manifestations following appropriate TBC treatment. Identifying this phenomenon is crucial, since it can be mistaken with treatment failure or relapse. Although widely described in HIV patients following immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, the literature on HIV‐negative patients is scarce. Case Series: We present three cases of immunocompetent patients with central nervous system tuberculosis (CNS‐TBC) who developed paradoxical reactions following appropriate TBC therapy. These included diverse clinical and radiological manifestations, such as persistent headaches, apparition or progression of tuberculomas, cerebral infarcts, and dorsal myelitis. Paradoxical reactions occurred within an average of 2.5 months from the start of anti‐TBC treatment. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the importance of closely monitoring patients following anti‐TBC treatment to identify potential complications rapidly. Paradoxical reactions due to exaggerated immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens should be considered in a thorough differential diagnosis including other CNS infections, granulomatous or neoplastic disorders, treatment failure, or treatment‐related toxicities. Ensuring adequate adherence to anti‐TBC treatment and immunosuppressants is essential in such cases.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Paradoxical Reactions of Central Nervous System Tuberculosis: Report of Three Immunocompetent Cases
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.