Synthetic Data for Robust Stroke Segmentation
Rattachement africain : gb, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Current deep learning-based approaches to lesion segmentation in neuroimaging often depend on high-resolution images and extensive annotated data, limiting clinical applicability. This paper introduces a novel synthetic data framework tailored for stroke lesion segmentation, expanding the SynthSeg methodology to incorporate lesion-specific augmentations that simulate diverse pathological features. Using a modified nnUNet architecture, our approach trains models with label maps from healthy and stroke datasets, facilitating segmentation across both normal and pathological tissue without reliance on specific sequence-based training. Our method achieves robust out-of-domain performance where conventional approaches fail, with in-domain performance of 48.2% Dice compared to 57.5% for conventional training. Crucially, even with oracle knowledge of the optimal domain adaptation method - an unrealistic scenario in practice - conventionally-trained models cannot match our synthetic approach in out-of-domain settings. The framework demonstrates that synthetic pre-training provides fundamental robustness unachievable through test-time adaptation alone. Our approach reduces reliance on domain-specific training data and helps bridge the gap between research-grade and clinical scans to improve clinical stroke neuroimaging workflows. PyTorch training code and weights are publicly available at https://github.com/liamchalcroft/SynthStroke, along with an SPM toolbox featuring a plug-and-play model at https://github.com/liamchalcroft/SynthStrokeSPM
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Synthetic Data for Robust Stroke Segmentation
- Date Crossref
- 14/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.