Comparison of Different Type Start Techniques in Bi-Finswimming
Rattachement africain : gr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objective: This study aimed to experimentally investigate the biomechanical and performance differences between the Grab Start (GS) and the Kick Start (KS) with each leg on the kickplate (KSR, KSL) in Bi-Finswimming (BFS). It focused on the effect of foot placement on the OSB11 starting block to determine potential performance advantages and contribute evidence-based recommendations for optimizing start techniques in competitive BFS. Methods: Thirteen national-level finswimmers (7 males, 6 females; age: 17.7 ± 2.1 years) voluntarily participated. Each athlete performed two trials of three start techniques (GS, KSR, KSL) over three days in randomized order. Four synchronized cameras recorded video data. Performance metrics (time to 5 m, 15 m, 25 m, reaction time, block time (BT), flight time (FT), and entry characteristics) along with joint angles (hip, knee, ankle), were analyzed using Kinovea software. Results: No significant gender differences were found (p > 0.05). Significant differences emerged between the starting techniques, with KS showing faster times (p < 0.001). BT was significantly longer in GS compared to KS (p < 0.001), while FT was shorter in GS (p = 0.002). Faster T5, T15, and T25 were associated with increased flight distance and longer FT in KSL. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the Kick Start technique generally outperforms the Grab Start, especially in block time, in Bi-Finswimming. It is recommended that this technique be legalized by CMAS for competition use.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of Different Type Start Techniques in Bi-Finswimming
- Date Crossref
- 19/08/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.