Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis
Rattachement africain : rs. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: The lockdown and other measures for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevention have presented an enormous burden on healthcare systems, causing reorganization in work and lowering the number of elective hospitalizations, along with a consequent reduction in hospital-acquired infections and bacteremia. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE). Methods: The study included 111 patients admitted for IE from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. They were divided in two groups chronologically according to the COVID-19 pandemic: the first group consisted of patients before the pandemic (n = 85), while the second group consisted of patients during the pandemic (n = 26). Results: Before the pandemic there were 2.26 ± 1.41 cases/month with diagnosis of IE, while during the pandemic there were only 1.14 ± 1.15 cases/month (p = 0.004). IE patients during the pandemic were younger (53 [41–65] vs. 68 [52–74] years; p < 0.05). A similar number of patients underwent surgical treatment before and during COVID-19 (53% vs. 67%; p = 0.210) and 30-day mortality was comparable (28% vs. 22%; p = 0.539). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures have led to a reduction in the number of patients with IE, although this change did not influence management strategies and mortality.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis
- Date Crossref
- 20/08/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.