A comparative analysis between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in screening for infective endocarditis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
Résumé fourni par la source
Background Infective endocarditis is commonly associated with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. While various guidelines regarding the need for echocardiography imaging exist, few studies directly compare transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).Methods We performed a single institution retrospective study from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2022, that compared the sensitivity of TTE and TEE in patients admitted with a diagnosis of S. aureus bacteremia.Results A total of 196 patients were included in the final analysis. Blood culture results revealed positivity for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus in 62.2% of cases and for methicillin-resistant S. aureus in 34.2% of cases. Thirty-six patients were excluded due to indeterminate imaging findings, leaving a subset of 160 for final analysis. Of this subset, 30 patients were found to have positive imaging findings on TTE and/or TEE. TEE detected 26 cases (87%), while TTE detected 7 cases (23%). TEE was significantly more sensitive than TTE (P = 0.0003).Conclusion In patients with S. aureus bacteremia who underwent sequential TTE followed by TEE, TEE was significantly more sensitive than TTE for detecting imaging evidence of infective endocarditis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- A comparative analysis between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in screening for infective endocarditis in patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteremia
- Date Crossref
- 19/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.