Longitudinal Bending Mechanical Performance of Double-O-Tube (DOT) Shield Tunnel

Le résumé fourni par la source

The longitudinal equivalent bending stiffness is a critical parameter for assessing the longitudinal responses of Double-O-Tube (DOT) shield tunnels under adjacent construction activities. Based on a longitudinal equivalent continuous model and the characteristics of the DOT shield tunnel cross-section, an analytical solution for the longitudinal equivalent bending stiffness (LEBS) of the DOT shield tunnel has been derived. Given that the cross-section of the DOT shield tunnel is an irregular structure, two scenarios are considered: one in which the neutral axis is located at the waist of the tunnel and another where it is situated at the lower arch. Using the structural design of the DOT shield tunnel for Shanghai Metro Line M8 as a case study, the effects of bolt number, segment thickness, segment width, and pillar height on the longitudinal equivalent bending stiffness have been investigated. Additionally, formulas for calculating the deformation and stress indices of the DOT shield tunnel have been established. The results indicate that increasing the number of bolts and widening the segments can enhance the longitudinal equivalent bending stiffness efficiency (LEBSE), resulting in an upward shift of the neutral axis. Conversely, as the segment thickness increases, the LEBSE decreases linearly while the neutral axis moves downward; however, the value of LEBS itself increases. With an increase in the pillar height angle, the neutral axis shifts upward, leading to an increase in the LEBS. When the pillar height angle is increased from 10° to 45°, the LEBSE decreases rapidly, followed by a gradual increase with further elevation in the pillar height angle. When the tunnel curvature radius exceeds 15,000 m, the bolts, segments, and joint openings remain in a safe state. However, when the curvature radius decreases to 5233 m, the maximum tensile stress on the bolts reaches their yield limit, and the joint openings exceed the warning threshold.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.