Depression in Romanian Medical Students—A Study, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis
Rattachement africain : ro, mx. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Depression is a significant global mental health concern, especially among medical students. This study combines two components: (1) a cross-sectional assessment of depression and related psychological and demographic factors among students at “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, and (2) a systematic review and meta-analysis of published Romanian studies on depression in medical students. Methods: For the cross-sectional component, 495 students (Years I–III) completed online questionnaires assessing depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), personality traits, procrastination, and sociodemographic factors. In the systematic review, studies from PubMed and Web of Science were synthesized following PRISMA guidelines, with prevalence data being pooled via random-effects meta-analysis. Results: In the Galați sample, 34.0% of students had clinically significant depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Depression was associated with female gender, being in the third year of study, low social support, high neuroticism, and procrastination. The meta-analysis (six studies, N = 1546) yielded a pooled national prevalence of 19.99% (95% CI: 18.24–21.73%). Conclusions: Depression is highly prevalent among Romanian medical students, particularly in Galați. The findings support the need for targeted mental health interventions in Romanian universities. Registration: This systematic review has been registered in the Prospero database (registration number CRD420251056873).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Depression in Romanian Medical Students—A Study, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis
- Date Crossref
- 19/08/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.