Longitudinal Clustering of Psychopathology Across Childhood and Adolescence: An Approach Toward Developmentally Based Classification
Rattachement africain : us, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Current classification systems of psychopathology focus on cross-sectional symptoms rather than continuity, discontinuity, and comorbidity across development. Here, a community sample of 600 youths was assessed every 3 years from early childhood through late adolescence using semistructured diagnostic interviews. We used longitudinal k -means clustering of joint-diagnostic trajectories to identify six distinct clusters (healthy, childhood anxiety, childhood/adolescent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, adolescent depression/anxiety, adolescent depression/substance use, and early childhood disruptive behavior). Comparing psychopathology clusters with the healthy cluster on age-3 predictors (parental education and psychopathology, early environment, temperament, cognitive and social functioning) and age-18 functional outcomes, we found that the clusters captured developmental patterning of psychopathology not apparent in cross-sectional nosology. The study serves as a proof of principle in applying a longitudinal clustering approach to common mental disorders, affording a rich perspective on the unfolding of sequential comorbidity and heterotypic continuity and identifying transdiagnostic subgroups with meaningful clinical, family, and temperamental correlates.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Longitudinal Clustering of Psychopathology Across Childhood and Adolescence: An Approach Toward Developmentally Based Classification
- Date Crossref
- 16/08/2025
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.