A Severe Vulnerability and an Effective Defense Against DFA on Ascon
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Differential Fault Attack ( DFA ) is a powerful cryptanalytic technique for recovering cryptographic keys by exploiting computational faults. At Indocrypt 2024, the first DFA on Ascon was introduced using a bit-flip fault model to recover a 64-bit key, followed by a bit-set fault model to extract another 64-bit key. However, this attack lacked practical validation. In this work, we revisit their approach and extend it by generalizing the attack to a more practical and widely accepted random fault model. Given that Ascon is implemented using bit-sliced techniques, we validate our attack through real-world experiments on a ChipWhisperer Lite platform using clock glitching. We demonstrate that the structure of Ascon inherently transforms random register faults into single-bit differences within the S-box operation, making it susceptible to DFA . We evaluate our attack under both nonce-misuse and nonce-respecting scenarios. In the nonce-misuse setting, we recover the first 64-bit key with only 50 random register faults and estimate the fault requirements for key recovery in the nonce-respecting case. Additionally, we identify a structural weakness in the Ascon tag selection process that increases its susceptibility to difference-based fault attacks. To counter this vulnerability, we propose an immediate countermeasure to strengthen its resistance against DFA .
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Severe Vulnerability and an Effective Defense Against DFA on Ascon
- Date Crossref
- 26/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.