Applicability of current chronic kidney disease criteria for mortality and end-stage kidney disease in older diabetic populations
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Since the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) naturally declines with age, age-adjusted chronic kidney disease diagnostic criteria have been proposed. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of estimated GFR (eGFR) on mortality and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in normoalbuminuric older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: We categorized patients aged ≥65 years without albuminuria who visited our diabetes center by their baseline eGFR levels. Primary outcomes were composite events encompassing all-cause mortality and ESKD. Results: Among 1,997 participants, 8%, 71%, 16%, and 5% had an eGFR of ≥90, 60-89, 45-59, and 15-44 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios for composite outcomes were 1.30 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.76) for those with an eGFR of 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2, compared to those with an eGFR of 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Subgroup analyses revealed consistently increased risk associated with eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 across individuals with body mass index <25 kg/m2 and those with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio <10 µg/mgCr. Conclusion: This study indicated that an eGFR of 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 possesses an elevated risk of composite events, which suggests that the current traditional eGFR criteria could be applicable to older patients with diabetes mellitus.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Applicability of current chronic kidney disease criteria for mortality and end-stage kidney disease in older diabetic populations
- Date Crossref
- 11/08/2025
- Éditeur
- The Korean Society of Nephrology
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.