Stay-Green Trait Enhances Grain Yield, Nutritional Quality, and Seed Germination Ability in Oat (Avena sativa L.) on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Le résumé fourni par la source

Oat is a dual-purpose crop valued for both grain and forage. The stay-green (SG) trait, which delays leaf senescence and prolongs photosynthesis, has been shown to increase yield and quality in several crop species, yet its performance across diverse environments in oats remains underexplored. In this study, multi-location field trials were conducted in Ledu, Huangzhong and Haiyan, Qinghai Province, China, to comprehensively evaluate the performance of stay-green oat lines. The traits evaluated included grain yield components, nutritional quality, and seedling establishment traits. A TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution) model, coefficient of variation (CV) and G × E (genotype × environment) visualization were used to assess adaptability, stability, and genotype × environment interactions. On average, the stay-green lines exhibited an 16.00% increase in plot yield and a 22.93% increase in thousand-grain weight compared to controls. Notable improvements were also observed in the starch (7.58% LN_SG in HZ and HY) and protein (3.58%, QY5_SG all the sites) contents, as well as multiple seedling establishment indices, with the seedling vigor indices increasing by more than 50%. Stability analysis further showed that the stay-green lines were stable in spike length, thousand-grain weight, water-soluble carbohydrates, and seed and seedling vigor. TOPSIS analysis identified ‘LN_SG’ as the top-performing and most adaptable genotype across all environments. Overall, stay-green oat lines demonstrated superior performance in grain yield, nutritional quality, and seedling establishment. These findings highlight their potential for field application and their value as parental materials in oat breeding programs enhancing environmental adaptability and stability.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.