The Impact of Model Retraining Frequency and Bias Correction on Predictive Performance in Air Quality Forecasting: Application of NASA’s GEOS-CF and Local Observational Data
Rattachement africain : us, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
To effectively address air pollution's environmental and health impacts, high-definition data and advanced methods capturing both temporal and spatial variations are essential. This paper presents a new approach that uses machine leaning models to improve air quality predictions based on large-scale atmospheric models and in-stu observations. The main focus of this paper is to examine the impact of the model type, refinement and retraining frequency on capturing seasonal variations in regional air quality via comparing different models and retraining intervals, to provide practical recommendations for optimizing machine learning-based air quality forecasting. Our findings reveal that while more frequent retraining significantly improves alignment with observed seasonal trends and improves predictive accuracy, it also increases data demands and computational costs. Importantly, Frequent retraining of models in stable environments tends to produce smaller improvements over time. This highlights the importance of choosing flexible model designs that can adapt well to the constantly changing patterns in air pollution data. These findings provide valuable advice for researchers, policymakers, and environmental organizations working to apply machine learning methods for better air quality management and control strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Impact of Model Retraining Frequency and Bias Correction on Predictive Performance in Air Quality Forecasting: Application of NASA’s GEOS-CF and Local Observational Data
- Date Crossref
- 12/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.