Evaluating the impact of Apollo Neuro™ wearable on wellbeing in medical and pharmacy students: A preliminary prospective randomized controlled study
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: Burnout affects up to 70% of US medical and pharmacy students, often accompanied by depression, anxiety, at-risk drinking, and suicidal ideation. While wellbeing interventions impacting mindfulness exist, they are often time- and cost-prohibitive. The Apollo Neuro™ (AN), a wearable device designed to regulate stress responses, may offer a low-burden alternative. METHODS: This pilot study assessed AN's impact on stress and wellbeing among medical and pharmacy students. Sixty-six students were randomized 1:1 to either receive the device (Active group) or join a waitlist (Control). Participants completed surveys at baseline, 6-, and 12-weeks, including the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-2), Medical Student Well-Being Index (MSWBI), Perceived Stress Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, students using AN showed significant improvement in burnout (MBI-2 total, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization) and MSWBI scores compared to controls. No significant changes were seen in resilience or alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: AN appears to be a feasible, efficacious tool for reducing burnout and improving wellbeing in health professional students, meriting further investigation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluating the impact of Apollo Neuro™ wearable on wellbeing in medical and pharmacy students: A preliminary prospective randomized controlled study
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.