Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Predictive Value of Nervous Cell Injury Biomarkers in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

10Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury (TBI) guides treatment decisions. Biomarkers such as S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have shown prognostication value, but relative effectiveness is unknown. This network meta-analysis (NMA) explored the relative predictive value of these 4 biomarkers for mortality and functional outcomes after moderate/severe TBI. METHODS: Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were searched using terms related to TBI, biomarkers, mortality, and functional outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS], GOS-Extended [GOSE]) until June 2024. Primary outcomes were mortality and functional outcomes (GOS/GOSE scores) at 3-12 months after injury. We included studies that provided biomarker levels, sensitivity/specificity values, and outcome measures in adults with moderate/severe TBI. RoB2 and ROBINS-I assessed the risk of bias. Data extraction followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Random-effects models pooled standardized mean difference (SMD), sensitivity, and specificity. Bayesian NMA estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs to evaluate indirect comparisons between the biomarkers. RESULTS: = 0%). Earlier sampling periods (<12 hours) were associated with more consistent and reliable results across all biomarkers. NSE had the highest sensitivity for mortality (88%, 77%-93%), and UCH-L1 had the highest specificity (89%, 76%-95%). S100B had the highest sensitivity for unfavorable functional outcomes (74%, 55%-88%), and GFAP had the highest specificity (84%, 71%-91%). With low comparative heterogeneity, NSE had the highest rank probability for mortality prediction while UCH-L1 predicted unfavorable functional outcomes. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that S100B, GFAP, NSE, and UCH-L1 have predictive value for mortality and functional outcomes in moderate/severe TBI. NSE was the most effective biomarker for predicting mortality. By contrast, UCH-L1 ranked highest for predicting unfavorable functional outcomes. Further research is needed to standardize protocols for measuring/providing data on biomarkers and to integrate them into predictive models for clinical use.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Predictive Value of Nervous Cell Injury Biomarkers in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Date Crossref
09/09/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

S100 Proteins and AnnexinsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.