The day‐to‐day stability of safety climate in the offshore oil and gas industry
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Despite the importance of safety climate, organizations typically only measure safety climate annually, at best. Organizational climate theory describes climate as a stable construct, yet it also proposes that climate is a function of the dynamic processes of symbolic interaction and sensemaking. The workplace safety literature emphasizes the need to maintain vigilance and avoid complacency, emphasizing the dynamic nature of organizations. This study followed two organizational samples of offshore oil and gas workers (Sample 1 [ n = 34]; Sample 2 [ n = 36]) for a period of 28 days (1623 daily observations of safety climate). Overall, the daily means, standard deviations and 1‐day lagged correlations of safety climate remained very stable over the course of the hitch (work period) and the stability of correlations over time was slightly more pronounced at the workgroup level. Despite this observed stability, the relationship between any two measurements of safety climate significantly diminished as the amount of time between measurements increased. Dynamic structural equation modelling revealed that some individuals perceived a much more stable safety climate than others, but none of the 15 person‐level variables explained this between‐person variability in stability. Results suggest that climate should be assessed monthly.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The day‐to‐day stability of safety climate in the offshore oil and gas industry
- Date Crossref
- 13/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Texas A&M University Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Department of Psychology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Wisconsin System pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Wisconsin–Madison pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
M University College Station Texas USA Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Texas A& pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Department of Psychology University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign Champaign Illinois USA pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences — Texas A&M University, Department of Psychology — University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign et University of Wisconsin System, avec 5 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.