A closed-loop audit to assess and improve surgical site infection rates across all surgical specialties
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To assess surgical specialty performance against established national data and to assess the impact of a seven-point surgical site infection (SSI) reduction checklist on elective general surgery SSI rates; specifically, SSI rates of <1% following clean procedures and <10% following clean-contaminated surgery. METHOD: Retrospective data were collected on selected patients undergoing surgery between July-August 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure, indication, SSI management, presence of additional complication and type of SSI were recorded. Follow-up telephone calls (with patient consent) were made to capture any additional SSIs. The reaudit period analysed elective general surgical procedures between May-June 2023, with the same data parameters. A perioperative seven-point checklist was implemented during the reaudit period in elective surgical theatres. RESULTS: Overall, 955 patients were included in the retrospective review of data. Of these, 138 patients had developed a SSI, yielding a 14.5% SSI rate, and 249 patients were included in general surgery with 45 (18.1%) developing SSIs. A total of 38 additional SSIs were identified after telephone follow-up across all specialties, representing 3.97% of the total number of patients and 22.46% of total SSIs. The completion rate of the seven-point checklist during the reaudit period was 47% (n=100). The SSI rate was 1%, with the one reported case not having a completed checklist. CONCLUSION: The results of this audit showed there was scope for improvement to reduce SSIs across specialties. A significant proportion of SSIs required admission to hospital and were only identified after telephone follow-up. The seven-point SSI reduction checklist significantly reduced the SSI rate for elective general surgical procedures.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A closed-loop audit to assess and improve surgical site infection rates across all surgical specialties
- Date Crossref
- 02/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Mark Allen Group
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.