Oral cholera vaccine uptake, acceptance and confidence among residents of a high-risk township in Zambia: key insights for future vaccination programs
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) prevent cholera and save lives. Given the recent 2024 country-wide cholera epidemic in Zambia, we determined self-reported OCV uptake, acceptance and confidence among adults living in a high-risk, cholera-prone township in Zambia. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from April to August 2024, involving 385 randomly selected adult participants residing in the Kanyama township of Lusaka, Zambia. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and statistically analysed. RESULTS: Self-reported uptake of at least one dose of the OCV was 18%, with the majority (315 [82%]) reporting being unvaccinated against cholera. Among those who were unvaccinated, vaccine acceptance was <10% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8 to 13.7), with higher rates reported among women than men (p=0.002). Despite this, the majority (210 [84.3%]) expressed confidence in the vaccination program. Those knowledgeable about the OCV were twice as likely to get vaccinated (adjusted odds ratio 2.60 [95% CI 1.19 to 5.68]). Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions were associated with OCV uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported OCV uptake and acceptance were low in a high-risk cholera-prone township in Zambia. Community education on the benefits of the vaccine is urgently needed to enhance confidence and attitudes towards the OCV and improve vaccination rates in the future.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Oral cholera vaccine uptake, acceptance and confidence among residents of a high-risk township in Zambia: key insights for future vaccination programs
- Date Crossref
- 12/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.