Long-term outcomes in deceased versus living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a bi-institutional study of 486 cases
Rattachement africain : it, sa. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is a curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but access is often limited by organ shortage and prolonged waiting times. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers timely transplantation and may improve oncologic outcomes compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 486 patients with HCC who underwent LT at two high-volume centers between 2010 and 2020. Outcomes were compared between LDLT and DDLT recipients. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients received LDLT and 304 received DDLT. Baseline tumor burden and liver function were comparable. LDLT was associated with shorter time to transplant (186 vs. 410 days, p < 0.001), fewer downstaging procedures, and improved survival. Five-year overall survival was 82% for LDLT versus 73% for DDLT (p = 0.010); disease-free survival was 93% versus 83% (p = 0.003). On multivariable analysis, DDLT (HR 3.03, p = 0.017) and BCLC B/C stage (HR 1.98, p = 0.017) were independent predictors of recurrence. CONCLUSION: LDLT is associated with superior long-term outcomes in patients with HCC, independent of tumor stage and timing. These findings support the broader use of LDLT as an effective oncologic strategy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Long-term outcomes in deceased versus living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a bi-institutional study of 486 cases
- Date Crossref
- 11/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.