Prevalence and functional characterization of anti-interferon autoantibodies in inflammatory myopathies
Rattachement africain : us, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: Functional autoantibodies targeting IFNs can lead to immunodeficiency and have been implicated in various autoimmune diseases. Despite the critical role of interferons in myositis pathogenesis, the significance of anti-IFN autoantibodies in inflammatory myopathies remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and functional impact of anti-IFN autoantibodies in patients with myositis. METHODS: Serum samples from 147 patients across two independent myositis cohorts were screened for autoantibodies against IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-ω and IFN-γ. An independent validation cohort of 34 patients was also assessed for autoantibodies against type I IFN. Functional assays were performed to evaluate whether these autoantibodies inhibited type I IFN-induced signal transduction or protein expression. RESULTS: Increased binding to IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-ω and IFN-γ was detected in 3.9%, 5.5%, 2.8% and 0.7% of patients, respectively. Their prevalence did not significantly differ among myositis subtypes. Functional assays revealed no relevant inhibitory effects on type I IFN signalling. CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with inflammatory myopathies harbour low-level anti-IFN autoantibodies, but the absence of functional activity suggests that these autoantibodies are unlikely to directly contribute to disease pathogenesis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevalence and functional characterization of anti-interferon autoantibodies in inflammatory myopathies
- Date Crossref
- 06/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.