First clinical diagnosis of FAME3 via commercial Long-Read sequencing reveals mosaic repeat expansion in MARCHF6 gene
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
in the MARCHF6 gene. Conventional genetic testing often fails to detect this expansion due to its repetitive structure and intronic location. We evaluated a 61-year-old woman with refractory myoclonic and generalized tonic-clonic seizures, whose prior genetic testing-including exome and genome sequencing-was non-diagnostic. Using PacBio HiFi long-read whole-genome sequencing and the tandem repeat genotyping tool TRGT, we identified a pathogenic MARCHF6 intronic expansion. The proband harbored one allele with 15 TTTTA repeats and a second allele with a compound expansion of 661 TTTTA and 12 TTTCA repeats. Three affected relatives shared similarly expanded alleles, but with increasing repeat size in the latter generations. Importantly, analysis using TRGT-instability revealed repeat mosaicism in all affected individuals, reflected by variability in motif counts across individual sequencing reads. This somatic heterogeneity may contribute to the phenotypic penetrance, variable expressivity and pleiotropism seen in FAME3 disease expression. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical diagnosis of FAME3 using a commercially available long-read sequencing platform, underscoring its diagnostic utility in resolving complex repeat expansion disorders and uncovering biologically relevant mosaicism.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- First clinical diagnosis of FAME3 via commercial Long-Read sequencing reveals mosaic repeat expansion in MARCHF6 gene
- Date Crossref
- 11/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.