Machine Learning‐Based Predictive Modeling Maximizes the Efficacy of mTOR /p53 Co‐Targeting Therapy Against AML
Résumé fourni par la source
Although mTOR signaling plays a key role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), mTOR inhibitors have shown limited efficacy against AML in clinical trials. In this study, we found that the anti-leukemic effect of mTOR inhibition was mediated in part through the TP53 pathway. mTOR inhibition by rapamycin and TP53 activation by DS-5272 collaboratively induced the downregulation of MYC and MCL1 partly through miR-34a, thereby inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in AML cells. Joint non-negative matrix factorization (JNMF) and statistical regression analysis using public AML databases revealed that monocytic AMLs with distinctive gene expression profiles were highly sensitive to mTOR inhibition, leading to the generation of an 11-gene score (Rapa-11) to predict the rapamycin sensitivity of each monocytic AML. Consistent with our in silico prediction, mouse AML cells expressing MLL-AF9, the monocytic AML with a low Rapa-11 score, were highly sensitive to rapamycin, whereas those expressing RUNX1-ETO or SETBP1/ASXL1 mutations were not. Co-treatment with rapamycin and DS-5272 had a dramatic in vivo effect on MLL-AF9-driven AML, curing 85% of the leukemic mice. Thus, machine learning-based predictive approaches identified monocytic AML with wild-type TP53 and low Rapa-11 score as a rapamycin-sensitive AML subtype and an ideal target for mTOR/p53 co-targeting therapy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Machine Learning‐Based Predictive Modeling Maximizes the Efficacy of <scp>mTOR</scp> /p53 Co‐Targeting Therapy Against <scp>AML</scp>
- Date Crossref
- 11/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.