Drone‐Based Photogrammetry Provides Estimates of the Energetic Cost of Migration for Humpback Whales Between Antarctica and Colombia
Résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Monitoring the body condition of animals offers insights into their energetic needs, prey consumption, and vulnerability to environmental pressures. Southern hemisphere humpback whales ( Megaptera novaeangliae ) depend on Antarctic krill for their annual energy requirements. Drone‐based photogrammetry was used to assess the energetic cost of migration and reproduction for breeding stock G humpback whales. Body measurements of 103 adult whales (2017–2019) were used to estimate body condition in Colombia (breeding ground) and the Western Antarctic Peninsula (feeding ground) and seasonal change was predicted. Humpback whales reached their peak body condition between early March and late May, and their lowest between late August and early December. The change in body condition was converted into losses of blubber volume, mass, lipid, energy, and ultimately the biomass of krill required to cover migration. On average, an adult humpback whale lost 36 percentage points of its body condition over the migration, equivalent to 12 m 3 or 11,000 kg of blubber tissue, 5000 kg of lipid, 196,000,000 kJ or 57,000 kg of Antarctic krill. By linking migration and reproductive energy costs to krill biomass, our findings provide critical ecological context for understanding how environmental changes such as krill population fluctuations could impact whale populations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Drone‐Based Photogrammetry Provides Estimates of the Energetic Cost of Migration for Humpback Whales Between Antarctica and Colombia
- Date Crossref
- 17/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.