Double aortic arch: a rare cause of adult-onset dysphagia

Le résumé fourni par la source

A 61-year-old woman complained of intermittent dysphagia to solids for 4 months. There was no previous history of similar episodes, and dyspnea and stridor were also denied. A preliminary esophagogastroduodenoscopy indicated pulsatile subepithelial protrusions in the middle part of the esophagus (22 cm to 30 cm from the incisors), accompanied by significant deformation of the esophageal lumen ([ Fig. 1 ] a , [ Video 1 ]). Endoscopic ultrasonography showed that the subepithelial protrusions derived from extraluminal compression rather than intramural lesions ([ Fig. 1 ] b ). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scanning confirmed that the extraluminal compressions were being caused by aberrant vascular configuration, resulting from the double aortic arch (DAA) ([ Fig. 2 ]). Therefore, it became evident that the patient’s dysphagia was caused by a complete vascular ring due to DAA. The patient refused further surgical intervention. Fig. 1 Endoscopic and endosonographic findings of esophageal submucosal protrusions. a Endoscopic views showed an esophageal protrusion with normal overlying mucosa 22 cm from the incisors, suggestive of a subepithelial lesion. b Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed an intact esophageal wall covering the protrusion, indicating extraluminal compression. Download Esophagogastroduodenoscopy indicated subepithelial protrusions and significant luminal deformation in the middle esophagus. Endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography confirmed that the changes arose from extraluminal compression by the double aortic arch.Video 1 Fig. 2 Computed tomography (CT) findings of the chest. Contrast-enhanced CT scanning demonstrated a vascular ring (arrowhead) compressing the esophagus posteriorly on: a axial view; b sagittal view. The compression resulted in narrowing of the esophageal lumen, corresponding to the esophageal endoscopic views 22 cm away from the incisors. c Coronal images showed the ascending aorta bifurcating into the right and left aortic arches (arrowhead). DAA is a rare congenital cardiovascular condition that results from the failure of the right fourth aortic arch to regress during embryonic development, constituting approximately 1% of cardiovascular congenital anomalies [ 1 ]. The vascular rings formed by the DAA may compress the encircled esophagus and trachea, causing dysphagia and wheezing. The clinical manifestations of DAA can differ depending on the degree of tightness of the ring and on subsequent tracheoesophageal compression. Some patients are completely asymptomatic, and others present late in life, as in this case. This patient developed dysphagia later in life, rather than earlier, which may be related to the altered elasticity of the arterial vessels in the elderly [ 2 ]. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AB_2AC_3AH Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy , reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/ ). This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos . Publication History Article published online: 08 August 2025 © 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.