FedECP: Enhancing global collaboration and local personalization for personalized federated learning
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Personalized federated learning (PFL) has received a lot of attention, owing to its significant advantages in addressing the statistical heterogeneity problem in federated learning (FL). Existing PFL methods typically partition model parameters by layers into two parts: shared parameters, which participate in global collaboration for learning shared knowledge among clients, and personalized parameters, which are retained locally to facilitate local personalization. However, during local training, parameters inevitably absorb both personalized and shared knowledge, preventing the shared and personalized parameters from effectively fulfilling their intended roles, weakening the effectiveness of global collaboration and local personalization. To address this issue, we propose a new PFL method called FedECP. FedECP stores global and personalized knowledge in separate models, preventing the interference and achieving a clearer separation of knowledge. Furthermore, we optimize the model learning strategy at both the feature representation and model parameter levels so that shared parameters learn shared knowledge, and the personalized parameters learn client-specific personalized knowledge. We conduct extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets, comparing FedECP with twelve state-of-the-art methods. The results demonstrate that FedECP performs well in various heterogeneous scenarios.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- FedECP: Enhancing global collaboration and local personalization for personalized federated learning
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.