Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and genetic diversity of Nipah virus strains from Bangladesh: 2016-2023
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: Nipah virus (NiV) causes deadly outbreaks in Bangladesh, with a fatality rate of 71%. Two sublineages, NiV-BD 1 and NiV-BD 2, have been identified. This study aimed to characterize their epidemiologic and clinical diversity. METHODS: This study analyzed 21 new (2016-2023) and 17 previously (2012-2015) reported NiV genome sequences and compared sublineages using descriptive and bivariate analysis. RESULTS: The median age of sequenced cases was 17 years (Interquartile Range (IQR): 9-30), 66% were male. Raw date palm sap consumption was main transmission pathway (92%). NiV-BD 2 showed a broader geographic distribution, including the southern region. The sublineages did not differ significantly in age, sex, or transmission modes. Both sublineages presented with fever, altered mental status, and unconsciousness. Respiratory distress was more frequent in NiV-BD 2 (23 of 29 cases), whereas hospitalization was longer for NiV-BD 1 (median: 3 days; IQR: 1-23). The overall mortality was 84%, with no significant difference between sublineages. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that NiV-BD 1 and NiV-BD 2 formed distinct clusters with 98.72-99.25% nucleotide and 99.98-99.99% amino acid identity. The structural nucleoprotein and matrix proteins remained conserved across sublineages. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights genetic, spatio-temporal, and clinical variation between sublineages, emphasizing continuous genomic surveillance to inform future vaccine and therapeutic strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and genetic diversity of Nipah virus strains from Bangladesh: 2016-2023
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.