Development of an assessment tool for open reduction and internal fixation of midshaft ulnar fractures: A global delphi consensus study

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: In acknowledgement of the ongoing transition of surgical education from a time-based approach to competency-based curricula, this study aimed to identify key parameters for assessing the performance of surgical trainees in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a simple ulnar shaft fracture (AO/OTA classification 2U2A3.B). METHODS: A 4-round Delphi process regarding seven different orthopedic osteosynthesis surgeries was conducted with an international panel of orthopedic surgeons involved in surgical education. This manuscript focuses on compression plating of isolated ulna fractures. Round 1 focused on item generation, round 2 on importance rating, round 3 on defining optimal intervals and borderline error values for a specific fracture model (not reported in this manuscript), and round 4 on assigning weights to each parameter. Data collection was carried out online. RESULTS: Ninety-eight surgeons agreed to participate in the study. Round 1 generated 30 assessment parameters. In round 2 and 3, these were reduced to 26 parameters. In round 4, parameters received an overall mean weight of 8.27 out of 10 (SD 0.66) with a range of individual parameter mean weights from 6.7 to 9.4. The assessment parameters that achieved the highest weights were anatomical fracture reduction and assessment of forearm range of motion after fixation. In the final list of parameters, five were related to fracture reduction, three to hardware choice, five to plate placement, nine to screw placement, and four to concluding the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing a Delphi process, expert consensus was reached generating a comprehensive list of 26 assessment parameters that can be used to assess surgeon performance in open reduction and internal fixation of an isolated adult ulnar shaft fracture. This will allow educators to provide standardized feedback (formative assessment) to trainees and use a mastery-learning training approach (summative assessment).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.