Dorsoradial Ligament Reconstruction For Instability After Trapeziometacarpal Dislocation
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) dislocations are rare injuries that can lead to chronic instability, pain, and early degenerative changes if not properly addressed. While multiple surgical techniques exist for stabilizing the TMC joint, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal approach. The dorsoradial ligament (DRL) has been increasingly recognized as the primary stabilizer of the TMC joint, and its insufficiency is a key contributor to post-traumatic instability. Traditional reconstruction techniques, such as the Eaton-Littler method, often involve tendon transfers, which introduce donor site morbidity, increased operative time, and prolonged recovery. Here, we describe a novel technique for DRL reconstruction utilizing a knotless suture augmentation system, providing a minimally invasive robust stabilization without the need for tendon transfer. Dorsoradial ligament reconstruction using knotless suture augmentation offers a technically simple, efficient, and less morbid alternative to tendon-based reconstruction techniques. This method provides early robust fixation while preserving native anatomy, potentially reducing failure rates associated with dorsoradial ligament insufficiency. While early results are promising, longer-term follow-up and larger sample sizes are needed to fully validate its efficacy in preventing post-traumatic arthritis and recurrent instability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Dorsoradial Ligament Reconstruction For Instability After Trapeziometacarpal Dislocation
- Date Crossref
- 07/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.