Minimal Invasive Surgical Treatment in Primary Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Phenolization of the Sinus Tract Versus Sinus Laser Assisted Closure; Long‐Term Follow‐Up of a Comparative Cohort Study
Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: No consensus has been reached on the preferred minimally invasive technique for treating primary, chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. This study will compare two extensively used minimally invasive techniques: phenolization of the sinus tract and sinus laser-assisted closure. METHODS: A comparative cohort study was conducted in two hospitals. Patients were matched on sex, age, number of sinus pits at surgery, and duration of follow-up. Patient records were examined for additional surgeries, and quality of life and symptoms were assessed with a questionnaire. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 47 months, seven patients (19.4%) in the phenolization group (n = 36) required additional surgery and 11 patients (30.6%) in the SiLaC group (n = 36) underwent additional surgery. Pain as a symptom at the natal cleft was significantly lower in the phenolization group, though not clinically relevant. The question regarding general health compared to preoperatively was reported to be significantly better in the phenolization group. However, other quality of life outcomes, such as the VAS score and the SF-36, did not differ significantly between phenolization and SiLaC. CONCLUSION: Both phenolization and sinus laser-assisted closure appear to be feasible for patients with primary SPSD, with no clear superiority of either technique.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Minimal Invasive Surgical Treatment in Primary Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Phenolization of the Sinus Tract Versus Sinus Laser Assisted Closure; Long‐Term Follow‐Up of a Comparative Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 06/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Diakonessenhuis hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Flevoziekenhuis pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University Medical Center Utrecht Department of Surgery pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University Medical Center Groningen Department of Abdominal Surgery pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Department of Surgery Diakonessenhuis Utrecht the Netherlands pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Diakonessenhuis hospital, Flevoziekenhuis et Department of Surgery — University Medical Center Utrecht, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.