Influence of application methods of urea and nano urea on growth, yield and economics of rainfed maize (Zea mays L.)
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The current study entitled "Influence of application methods of urea and nano urea on growth, yield and economics of rainfed maize (Zea mays L)".The study was conducted at the Research Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Guru Kashi University, Talwandi Sabo.The experiment was consisted of eight treatment combinations, and was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications.In this study, the treatment N2 100% of RDN + 2% nano urea at 30 and 50 DAS showed the highest response to plant height of 140.16 cm, 182.06 cm and 204.23 cm and dry matter 61.39 q/ha, 78.28 q/ha and 92.11 q/ha at 60 DAS, 90 DAS and at harvest respectively.The treatment N2 100% of RDN + 2% nano urea at 30 and 50 DAS produce highest cobs per plant 1.95, cob length 17.72 cm, cob weight 276.24 grams, number of grains per cob 467.1, 1000 grain weight of maize was 255.38 gm, grain yield (69.72 q/ha), stover yield 110.16 q/ha and 179.88 q/ha of biological yield per hectare.The highest harvest index produced by the treatment N2 100% of RDN + 2% nano urea at 30 and 50 DAS is 38.76%.The treatment with the N2 100% of RDN + 2% nano-urea spray at 30 and 50 DAS resulted in the highest gross return of Rs. (156172) per hectare, net returns of Rs. (110121) per hectare, and a BC ratio of 2.39, outperforming the control and other treatments.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Influence of application methods of urea and nano urea on growth, yield and economics of rainfed maize (Zea mays L.)
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Comprehensive Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.