Estimating production technologies using multi-output adaptive constrained enveloping splines
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely used method for evaluating the relative efficiency of decision-making units, but it often yields overly optimistic efficiency estimates, particularly with small sample sizes. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Adaptive Constrained Enveloping Splines (ACES), a non-parametric technique based on regression splines to accommodate multi-output, multi-input production contexts. ACES employs a three-stage estimation process. In the first stage, optimal output levels are estimated while incorporating essential envelope constraints, with optional monotonicity and/or concavity adjustments as needed. In the second stage, a refinement phase is carried out in which some of the estimates made are replaced by the observed values. Finally, a DEA-type technology is constructed using a new virtual data sample, ensuring adherence to usual shape constraints. Although ACES entails a higher computational cost, it achieves substantially lower mean squared error and bias than alternative methods of the literature across a wide range of simulated scenarios. This improvement is particularly pronounced in settings with complex production structures or heterogeneous returns to scale. This performance is consistent across both noise-free and noisy data environments, underscoring the method’s robustness and accuracy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Estimating production technologies using multi-output adaptive constrained enveloping splines
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.