Point-of-Care Urine Metabolomics Test to Diagnose Colorectal Cancers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Controlled Trial in Southwestern Nigeria

Résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of a point-of-care (POC) real-time urine metabolomics test, evaluate its validity in diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC) among at-risk patients, and assess the willingness of patients in Southwestern Nigeria to use and pay for the test. METHODS: This was a pilot-controlled trial carried out among 72 patients (34 cases and 38 controls) in southwestern Nigeria. The cases were those with histopathological diagnosis of CRC while controls were at-risk adults. The POC biosensor used a disposable chip and can be connected to a smart device using Bluetooth, and reported if the patient's urine contained metabolites consistent with CRC. We assessed validity of the test using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and prespecified a specificity of 50% with a goal of ≥80% sensitivity to estimate the potential of the test to half the referrals to colonoscopy. Additionally, we assessed perception toward the test and willingness to uptake the urine test using structured questionnaires. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for all respondents were 91.18%, 81.58%, 81.58%, and 91.18% respectively, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86. With specificity fixed at 50%, the overall sensitivity for all respondents was 94.5%, and all stratifications had sensitivity >90%. Overall, 70 (98.6%) were satisfied with the urine-based CRC screening, and respondents were willing to pay a mean amount of 8,008.20 Naira (about $5.2 US dollars) for the test. CONCLUSION: Our urine metabolite early diagnosis POC test met our predetermined criteria for success and had high acceptance rates among Nigerian patients, supporting a future multi-institutional implementation trial assessing our ability to scale up utilization.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.