The RING finger E3 ligase RNF25 protects DNA replication forks independently of its canonical roles in ubiquitin signaling
Rattachement africain : us, bg. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms that allow cells to tolerate DNA replication stress are critically important for genome stability and cell viability. Using an unbiased genetic screen, we identify a role for the RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF25 in promoting DNA replication stress tolerance. In response to DNA replication stress, RNF25-deficient cells generate aberrantly high levels of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), accumulate in S-phase and show reduced mitotic entry. Using single-molecule DNA fiber analysis, we show that RNF25 protects reversed DNA replication forks generated by the fork remodeler HLTF from nucleolytic degradation by MRE11 and CtIP. Mechanistically, RNF25 interacts with the replication fork protection factor REV7 and recruits REV7 to nascent DNA after replication stress. The role of RNF25 in protecting replication forks is fully separable from its canonical functions in ubiquitin conjugation. This work reveals the RNF25-REV7 signaling axis as an important protective mechanism in cells experiencing replication stress. DNA replication stress is a driver of genome instability. Here, the authors identify a role of the E3 ligase RNF25 in promoting replication stress tolerance. Mechanistically, RNF25 recruits the fork protection factor REV7 to stalled replication forks and prevents nucleolytic degradation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The RING finger E3 ligase RNF25 protects DNA replication forks independently of its canonical roles in ubiquitin signaling
- Date Crossref
- 05/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.