Exercise training increases skeletal muscle sphingomyelinases and affects mitochondrial quality control in men with type 2 diabetes

Le résumé fourni par la source

Lipotoxic ceramides (CERs) are implicated in the development of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related complications. Exercise training improves insulin sensitivity, potentially via reducing intracellular lipids or enhancing mitochondrial oxidation. Acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), which hydrolyzes sphingomyelin (SM) to CERs, is crucial for muscle repair and development, yet its role in insulin-resistant states and response to exercise remain unclear. We assessed ASM protein and activity, neutral sphingomyelinase (NSM) and sphingolipid species in skeletal muscle of insulin-sensitive (IS, n = 12), insulin-resistant (IR, n = 11) and T2D men (n = 20), before and after a 12-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Comprehensive phenotyping comprised hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps, spiroergometry, targeted lipidomics and assessment of markers of mitochondrial quality control. ASM protein was lower at baseline and increased after HIIT only in T2D (p < 0.05), while ASM activity rose across all groups (IS p < 0.01; IR and T2D p < 0.001). HIIT also increased NSM protein in all groups (p < 0.05). Despite lower baseline SM levels in T2D, HIIT led to elevated CERs species in T2D (C16:0, C20:0, C22:0, C24:1, C24:0) and in IR (C16:0, C20:0) (all p < 0.05). Regression analysis suggested that changes in ASM protein and activity relate to changes in mitochondrial fusion and fission as well as AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-mediated mitophagy. In conclusion, HIIT induces expression of both ASM and NSM and alters CER profiles in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle, independently of changes in insulin sensitivity. ASM could therefore rather contribute to exercise-induced mitochondrial remodeling than driving lipotoxicity, warranting further investigation of ASM as a potential target for exercise mimetic therapies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.