Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Chest X-ray Interpretation Tools for Screening of Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a major worldwide health concern, which is the leading cause of death in nations like India. Despite various efforts to combat TB, effective screening and timely diagnosis remain challenging. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in computer-aided interpretation of Chest X-Rays (CXRs) has demonstrated potential in improving TB detection. Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted CXR interpretation tools for TB screening. Materials and Methods: Authors employed Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (SR/MA) using the Preferred Reporting Items for SR/MA of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guideline. A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies published between January 2019 and December 2023, focusing on AI-assisted software’s diagnostic accuracy in interpreting CXRs. Electronic databases such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Xplore (IEEE) were used. The raw diagnostic accuracy data, sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the studies that met the inclusion criteria were examined and meta analysed to estimate pooled diagnostic accuracy measures. Results: There were 1,825 records found in the database search. Ensuing screening and duplication removal, 170 fulltext publications were assessed; 14 of them satisfied the requirements for inclusion in the SR/MA. The findings of SR highlight the important role of AI assisted diagnostic tools in faster and larger screening of patients. The meta-analysis revealed the overall sensitivity of AI assisted tools to be 92% (62.9-98.7%) while specificity was 98.2% (68.4-99.9%). Conclusion: Although the large confidence interval questions the generalisability of the findings and consistency of the results, the present review signifies the important horizon that can be explored further for strengthening the TB elimination efforts.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Chest X-ray Interpretation Tools for Screening of Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Date Crossref
01/08/2025
Éditeur
JCDR Research and Publications
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

COVID-19 diagnosis using AIRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingAI in cancer detection

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.