Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against post-COVID-19 condition/long COVID: systematic review and meta-analysis

11Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 can develop long-term symptoms known as postCOVID-19 condition (PCC; symptoms ≥3 months after infection) or long COVID (LC; symptoms ≥1 month after infection). Vaccination against COVID-19 might prevent PCC/LC, but the extent of protection is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the vaccine efficacy/effectiveness (VE) of COVID-19 vaccines given prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection in preventing PCC or LC. METHODS DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified in Embase, MEDLINE, PreView, COVID-19 L.OVE repository, and Cochrane Library up to August 1, 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions (NRSI) that investigated immunization with a COVID-19 vaccine before SARS-CoV-2 infection were eligible, irrespective of participant age and sex. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: Risk of bias was assessed using the ''Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions'' tool. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Primary outcome was PCC, secondary outcomes were LC, time until reconvalescence, limitations in everyday activity, and quality of life. Meta-analyses were primarily conducted using the random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 6423 records were screened, and 65 NRSI reporting adjusted estimates were included, comprising >5.7 mio. PARTICIPANTS: VE for ≥1 vaccine dose against PCC was 41.0% (95% CI 27.8%; 51.7%; 22 NRSI, certainty of evidence: low). VE after 1, 2, or 3 doses versus unvaccinated was 19.1% (-119.4%; 70.2%, 3 NRSI), 43.2% (4.5%; 66.2%; 4 NRSI), and 70.0% (30.0%; 87.0%; 1 NRSI), respectively. In <18 years old, VE against PCC was 26% for ≥1 dose (-4%; 48%, 1 NRSI) and in >60 years old 41% (17%; 59%, 1 NRSI). VE after pre-Omicron-SARS-CoV-2 infection was 32.1% (-54.3%; 70.1%, 3 NRSI) and 20.9% (-10.1%; 43.3%, 2 NRSI) after Omicron infection. Sensitivity analyses indicated no influence of risk of bias and effect measure. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccines may be moderately effective in preventing PCC/LC. VE may increase with the number of vaccine doses administered.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against post-COVID-19 condition/long COVID: systematic review and meta-analysis
Date Crossref
01/12/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Robert Koch Institute Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • University of Freiburg Institute for Evidence in Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Strategy and Incident Response (ZBS 7) Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens (ZBS) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise

Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology — Robert Koch Institute, Institute for Evidence in Medicine — University of Freiburg et Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens (ZBS) — Strategy and Incident Response (ZBS 7).

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Long-Term Effects of COVID-19SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.