Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy for Septic Arthritis Through Multivariate Analysis of Serum and Synovial Biomarkers

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Septic arthritis is an orthopedic emergency. However, optimal biomarkers and diagnostic criteria remain unclear. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of routinely used and novel biomarkers, including serum C-reactive protein (CRP), synovial white blood cells (WBC), pentraxin-3 (PTX3), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and presepsin, in distinguishing septic from non-septic arthritis. Methods: Thirty-one patients undergoing arthrocentesis were included. Patients were categorized into septic and non-septic arthritis groups. Synovial fluid and serum samples were analyzed for five biomarkers. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: Synovial WBC demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance among single biomarkers (AUC = 0.837, p = 0.012). Among novel biomarkers, PTX3 showed the highest accuracy and sensitivity. The serum CRP and synovial WBC combination yielded an AUC of 0.853, with 100% sensitivity, 68.0% specificity, 42.9% PPV, and 100% NPV. Adding all three novel biomarkers to this combination increased the AUC to 0.887 (p = 0.004), maintaining 100% sensitivity and NPV. When individually added, PTX3 achieved 100% sensitivity and NPV, while presepsin showed the highest specificity (96.0%), PPV (75.0%), and accuracy (87.1%). Conclusions: Serum CRP and synovial WBC remain essential biomarkers for diagnosing septic arthritis; however, combining them with PTX3, IL-6, and presepsin improved diagnostic accuracy. PTX3 is best suited for ruling out septic arthritis due to its high sensitivity and NPV, whereas presepsin is more useful for confirmation, given its specificity and PPV. These results support a tailored biomarker approach aligned with diagnostic intent.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.