Corneal parameters in pediatric triple a syndrome patients with alacrima
Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction To evaluate the changes in central corneal thickness and curvature parameters in pediatric patients with Triple A syndrome and alacrima.Methods This retrospective study included 52 eyes of 26 patients with Triple A syndrome. All patients had alacrima. Pentacam was used to analyze the keratometry in the flat (K1) and steep meridian (K2) and maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometry (Kmean) readings, central corneal thickness at the vertex (CCT) and at the thinnest point (CCT-TP) were recorded. Patients were divided into three groups based on their age (Group 1: 3–6 years, group 2: 7–12 years, group 3: 13–18 years). Values were compared between pediatric patients with Triple A and normal controls.Results The K1 values of all patients were significantly higher than those observed in healthy data (p < 0.001). 15 Group 1 had significantly lower K2 and higher CCT values (p = 0.008, p = 0.015). In group 2, K1 and Kmax were significantly higher, while CCT and CCT-TP were lower (p = 0.016, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). In group 3, K1 and CCT and CCT-TP were significantly higher than the normal data (p = 0.019, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively).Discussion Since dry eye syndrome may cause corneal changes, in AAAS patients, corneal topographic variations may occur due to alacrima. Thus, these patients should be evaluated during follow-up visits.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Corneal parameters in pediatric triple a syndrome patients with alacrima
- Date Crossref
- 04/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.