Refined genotype–phenotype correlations in neurofibromatosis type 1 patients with NF1 point variants
Résumé fourni par la source
Background Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most frequent genetic disorders. NF1 is caused by dominant loss-of-function pathogenic variants (PVs) of the tumour-suppressor gene NF1 , which encodes neurofibromin, a negative regulator of rat sarcoma proteins. NF1 is an autosomal dominant disorder with complete penetrance, but a highly variable expression. Identification of genotype–phenotype correlations is challenging because of the wide clinical variability, the progressive nature of the disorder and the extreme diversity of the mutation spectrum. Only a few NF1 point variants have been associated with a specific phenotype in NF1 patients. Methods We investigated a large, well-phenotyped NF1 cohort. Results We report analyses of genotype-phenotype correlations in 112 NF1 patients with specific NF1 point variants: p.Arg1809 missense variants were associated with a mild form of NF1 (n=24), while a more severe phenotype was associated with codons 844–848 (n=27), p.Arg1276 (n=25) and p.Lys1423 (n=35) missense variants. We describe a new correlation for p.Arg1204 missense variants (n=11), with no neurofibroma observed in patients. Functional studies will be critical for drawing conclusions on the potential hypomorphic or dominant-negative effects of these variants. Conclusion The current data confirms several genotype-phenotype correlations in NF1, which may be relevant to the management and surveillance of NF1 patients with specific NF1 PVs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Refined genotype–phenotype correlations in neurofibromatosis type 1 patients with <i>NF1</i> point variants
- Date Crossref
- 04/08/2025
- Éditeur
- BMJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.