Impact of Cattle Breed in scRNA-Seq Reference on Muscle Fiber Type Deconvolution from Bulk RNA-Seq: A Comparison of Software Tools
Résumé fourni par la source
While bulk RNA sequencing provides a comprehensive view of transcriptomes, it lacks cell type specificity. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) overcomes this limitation by providing detailed insights at the individual cell level, though it involves higher costs. Deconvolution methods can estimate cell type proportions in bulk RNA-seq data, but their results may vary based on the scRNA-seq reference data and software used. This study investigates the estimation of muscle fiber type proportions through deconvolution analysis of Longissimus dorsi muscle bulk RNA-seq data from late-gestation Holstein Friesian multiparous cows. Four software tools (i.e., CIBERSORTx, Cellanneal, DeconvR-NNLS, and DeconvR-RLM) were compared using scRNA-seq reference data from Brahman and Wagyu cattle breeds, which included proportions of types I, IIa, and IIx myofibers. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s tests revealed that the breed of reference data significantly influenced the proportions of type IIa and IIx muscle fibers across different deconvolution methods. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show that the cattle breed used in reference scRNA-seq data can substantially impact deconvolution outcomes, highlighting a critical consideration for accurate cell type proportion estimation in livestock genomics. These findings suggest that future deconvolution studies should carefully consider breed compatibility between reference and target datasets.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of Cattle Breed in scRNA-Seq Reference on Muscle Fiber Type Deconvolution from Bulk RNA-Seq: A Comparison of Software Tools
- Date Crossref
- 25/07/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.