Impact of knowledge and attitude on inappropriate post-concussion behaviors in competitive cyclists
Rattachement africain : jp, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To measure epidemiological data on concussions and examine the association between knowledge and attitudes about concussions and inappropriate post-injury behavior. DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 365 competitive cyclists in Japan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey items included participant information, the experience of concussion-like symptoms, concussion knowledge index (CKI) score, concussion attitude index (CAI) score, and inappropriate behavior post-concussion injury. RESULTS: The prevalence of concussion-like symptoms among all competitive cyclists was 45.8%. CKI and CAI scores for all participants were 21.7 ± 3.4 and 10.5 ± 3.4, respectively. No significant differences were identified in CKI and CAI scores based on concussion-like symptom experience. After adjusting for covariates, we found that the risk of 'returning to training without rest after injury' decreased by 20% for each 1-point increase in CKI score. In contrast, the risk of 'returning to training with symptoms remaining' decreased by 13% for each 1-point increase in CAI. CONCLUSIONS: An association was found between concussion knowledge and return to competition without a period of rest post-injury, as well as between attitude toward concussion and return to competition with symptoms. Therefore, these findings can contribute to concussion education among cyclists.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of knowledge and attitude on inappropriate post-concussion behaviors in competitive cyclists
- Date Crossref
- 03/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.