Morphological Diversity of Moroccan Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L. 1758): Insights from a Geometric Morphometric Study of Wing Venation in Honey Bees from Different Climatic Regions
Résumé fourni par la source
The morphological diversity of Moroccan honey bees (Apis mellifera) was investigated using geometric morphometrics to assess wing venation patterns among three populations representing three climatic zones: desert, semiarid, and Mediterranean. A total of 193 honey bee samples were analyzed and compared to historical reference samples from the Morphometric Bee Data Bank in Oberursel, representing the three subspecies: A. m. intermissa, A. m. sahariensis, and A. m. major. Principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis revealed significant, yet overlapping morphological differences among the climatic groups. Spatial modeling showed a significant southwest–northeast clinal gradient in wing morphology. Almost all samples were assigned to the African evolutionary lineage, except one, suggesting a dominant African genetic background. Interestingly, all three populations showed greater morphological affinity to A. m. intermissa than to A. m. sahariensis, which could indicate introgression or limitations in the current reference dataset. These discrepancies highlight the necessity of revising subspecies boundaries using updated morphometric and genomic approaches. These findings improve our understanding of honey bee biodiversity in Morocco and provide valuable information for conservation and breeding programs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Morphological Diversity of Moroccan Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L. 1758): Insights from a Geometric Morphometric Study of Wing Venation in Honey Bees from Different Climatic Regions
- Date Crossref
- 29/07/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.