Consensus Document SEPAR–AAMR–ALAT–ASONEUMOCITO–SMNCT on Assessment and Treatment for Consumers of New Tobacco and Nicotine Products
Rattachement africain : es, ar, co, mx. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The use of new tobacco and nicotine products (electronic nicotine delivery system, heated tobacco, and smoking water pipes) has increased in recent years worldwide. This has led to the emergence of a new smoker profile whose diagnostic and therapeutic approach is different from that of conventional tobacco smokers. The demand for help in quitting these new forms of smoking necessitates the development of guidelines or recommendations that are not currently available. Therefore, the Tobacco Control Group of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) and in collaboration with Ibero American societies (AAMR, ALAT, ASONEUMOCITO, SNMCT) have produced a consensus document using the nominal focus group methodology, supported by a narrative review on the approach to smoking in users of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and new forms of tobacco. The approach to diagnosing these types of users will be based on variables such as intensity, degree of nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and motivation, using new scales or questionnaires. Psychological counseling will be based on psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Nicotine replacement therapy, varenicline, cytisinicline, and burpropion are medications to consider for users of these devices.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Consensus Document SEPAR–AAMR–ALAT–ASONEUMOCITO–SMNCT on Assessment and Treatment for Consumers of New Tobacco and Nicotine Products
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.