Findings and Significance of Early Follow-Up Biopsies After Treatment of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Rattachement africain : fi. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Treatment resistant acute rejection after kidney transplantation is linked to inferior outcomes, yet many centers do not routinely perform follow-up biopsies. The optimal timing of such biopsies remains uncertain. We evaluated findings from follow-up biopsies performed ≤45 days after treatment of acute rejection and assessed their association with long-term outcomes. Adult kidney transplants performed from 01/2014 to 07/2024 were included (n = 2,420). Acute rejections were classified according to Banff criteria. T-cell-mediated rejection, including borderline TCMR changes, was treated with pulse steroids; antibody-mediated rejection was treated with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange. Findings from follow-up biopsies taken ≤45 days after treatment of early acute rejection were correlated with graft outcomes. Of 383 patients (16%) with acute rejection within 3 months post-transplant, 221 underwent a follow-up biopsy ≤45 days. Of these, 50% were taken by protocol and 50% because of clinical reasons. In 164 cases (74%), rejection changes had resolved. At 1-year, median creatinine was 1.3 mg/dL in those without rejection, 1.6 mg/dL in patients with persistent changes, and 1.5 mg/dL in those with resolved changes. Persistent histologic rejection within 45 days was associated with inferior long-term graft survival.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Findings and Significance of Early Follow-Up Biopsies After Treatment of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.