Attention Deficit and Memory Function in Children with Bronchial Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 104,975 Patients with Trial Sequential Analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease affecting approximately 5 million children in the US, but little is known about whether asthma alters children’s attention and memory functions. Most studies on this topic focus on psychiatric and QoL outcomes rather than cognitive functions, leaving a gap in the literature. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the attention deficit and memory function outcomes in children with bronchial asthma. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to 28 February 2025 for studies evaluating attention deficit and memory function in children with bronchial asthma. Outcomes of interest included attention deficit and memory function. Statistical analysis was performed with R 4.3.1. Heterogeneity was accessed using the I2 statistics and Cochrane Q test. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with restricted maximum-likelihood estimator random-effects method was computed for all outcomes. Results: A total of seven studies were included in the final meta-analysis, comprising 104,975 patients, of whom 10,200 (9.7%) had bronchial asthma (mean age ± 8.98 years, mean 45% females). In the pooled analysis, children with asthma had a worsened attention deficit compared to the healthy group (SMD 0.29; 95% CI [0.07; 0.51]; p = 0.01; I2 = 92%). However, no statistically significant difference was found in memory function between groups (SMD −0.24; 95% CI [−1.81; 1.33]; p = 0.77; I2 = 96%). Conclusions: Children with asthma showed significantly higher attention deficit scores compared to healthy children. No statistically significant differences were observed in memory function between the groups. These findings may have implications for early cognitive screening in pediatric asthma management.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.