Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Nutritional support and metabolic control technologies in intensive care units. Results of a multicenter prospective screening study

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
44Institutions déclarées
5Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ru, de, cn, us, se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Nutritional support is an integral part of the treatment process in the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients in critical care receive some methods of enteral or parenteral nutrition based on often conflicting guidelines and controversial strategies. OBJECTIVE: To identify key trends in the use of metabolic control and nutritional support technologies in ICUs of different profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The project of this screening study was developed by members of the FAR RF Committee on Nutritional Support and Metabolic Control. The design trial was simple random sampling. The study included 569 ICU patients. Results. The mean age of the patients was 59.22 ± 17.93 years. APACHE II scale — 1.3 ± 3.9 points, according to SOFA scale — 3.7 ± 1.5 points. 56 % of patients underwent surgical interventions, 45 % were on mechanical ventilation, 28-day mortality — 24 %. In 25 % of oncological patients the total protein was below 50 g\l. Serum albumin level was statistically significantly lower (p = 0,013) in the group of patients with acute cerebral insufficiency (ACI) in comparison with oncosurgical patients. In 25 % of multidisciplinary ICU patients albumin concentration was below 25 g/l. Energy requirement was determined empiricaly in 44 % of oncologic patients, in 50 % of patients with ACI the method of c equations was used, and indirect calorimetry was used in all groups in no more than 1 % of cases. Protein requirements were empirically determined in 20 % of cases in all groups. 35 % of physicians estimated the protein requirement based on the value of 1.2–1.5 g/kg/day. Enteral tube feeding was more frequently used by 70 % of ACI patients and 29 % in the oncology group. In contrast, 29 % of oncologic patients received parenteral nutrition. Only 5 % of patients with ACI required parenteral nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of ICU patients are characterized by such manifestations of protein-energy deficiency as hypoproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypotransferrinemia. Enteral tube feeding is the prevailing method of nutritional support in ICU. The main problem identified in the course of screening should be considered the very rare use of metabolic monitoring technologies and the lack of a personalized approach to the selection of the nutritional support program.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Nutritional support and metabolic control technologies in intensive care units. Results of a multicenter prospective screening study Технологии нутритивной поддержки и метаболического контроля в отделениях реанимации и интенсивной терапии. Результаты многоцентрового проспективного скринингового исследования
Date Crossref
07/08/2025
Éditeur
Practical Medicine Publishing House
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research CentreRegional Children's Clinical Hospital No. 1Max Planck SocietySt Petersburg UniversityChelyabinsk State Medical AcademyChongqing UniversityChildren's City Clinical Hospital №11Bashkir State Medical UniversityArkhangel'skiy Klinicheskiy Onkologicheskiy DispanserHuman Growth FoundationNovokuznetsk State Institute of Advanced Medical EducationOmsk State Medical UniversityRussian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional EducationFar Eastern State Medical UniversityMedical Radiological Research CenterOrenburg State Medical AcademyKrasnoyarsk Regional Clinical HospitalKuban State Medical UniversityNorthern State Medical UniversityCentral Clinical Hospital and PolyclinicHUI Research (Sweden)Pirogov Russian National Research Medical UniversityVoronezh Regional Clinical Oncology CenterSaint-Petersburg I. I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency MedicineAltai State Medical UniversityCentral Clinical Hospital No 2 named SemashkoUlyanovsk State UniversityV.A. Negovsky Scientific Research Institute of General ReanimatologyFar Eastern Federal UniversityNorth-Western State Medical University named after I.I. MechnikovResearch Institute of Emergency CareKazan State Medical UniversityNovosibirsk State Medical UniversityAcademician Pilyugin CenterTyumen State Medical UniversityIzhevsk State Medical AcademyS. M. Kirov Military Medical AcademyRussian Cancer Research Center NN BlokhinStavropol State Medical UniversityMoscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyKemerovo State UniversityPerm State Institute of Arts and CultureNizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital named after SemashkoSechenov University

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyAbdominal Surgery and ComplicationsNutrition and Health in Aging

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.